William Hazlitt is recognised as a founder of English literary criticism and a magnificent exponent of the art of the essay. But he spent the first half of his career grappling with abstract questions in philosophy, and the fact that he had to abandon the rigours of theoretical writing in favour of relaxed literary journalism was always a source of regret to him.
The purpose of these five 15-minute talks is to evoke and celebrate Hazlitt’s work as a philosopher, and show how it helped shape the celebrated ‘familiar style’ of his later essays. Implicitly, it will also seek to show that rumours of a fundamental antipathy between philosophy and English literature are greatly exaggerated.
Each talk will present a story of its own, told to a considerable extent (about one fifth) in Hazlitt’s own words.
Four: First acquaintance with the poets
After giving up school, Hazlitt spent three years painting, reading Rousseau, and pursuing the life of a ‘solitary thinker.’ At the end of 1797 his father was excited at the prospect of the appointment of a new Unitarian minister at Shrewsbury. The candidate was a young man who seemed to be everything that the Reverend Hazlitt had hoped for in his son – a philosopher, a fearless radical, and apparently a talented preacher. His name was Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and the young William Hazlitt went off to hear him deliver a trial sermon. A couple of days later, Coleridge came to Wem and spent an evening talking to the Unitarian minister; he also noticed his shy young admirer and invited him to come and stay in his little cottage at Nether Stowey just the other side of Bristol: he could meet his friend William Wordsworth, and they could take long philosophical walks together.